Starring James Franco, Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz and Michelle Williams, this movie adapted from a fairy tale is mainly for the kids, I felt. Having said that, I love the landscape, which was a magical setting with many magical and out of this world plants. I was thrilled by the amazing plants and forest creatures. That much I really enjoyed.
There was the familiar yellow brick road but that was where the magical experience ended. There wasn't the familiar Dorothy, Scarecrow, Lion and Doggy anywhere. Some movie critics commented that James Franco was the weakest link in the movie but I begged to differ. He was humourously funny and I thought he did well playing the self-centred magician turned hero. Rachel Weisz was as usual, looking ever so pretty as one of the wicked witches. Mila Kunis was alright. I personally didn't like Michelle William's portrayal of the good witch though.
I wonder if there will be any sequels to introduce the original characters of the fairy tale although I seriously doubt so.
Showing posts with label rachel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rachel. Show all posts
04 April 2013
01 January 2012
SHERLOCK HOLMES: A GAME OF SHADOWS
I didn't watch the first Sherlock Holmes at the movies because I don't like Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law although I vaguely remember watching it on TV, I think. In fact, I have never like both actors.
Anyway, I went to watch the above recently and it was exactly what I expected it to be. Directed by Guy Ritchie, this recent series on the famous detective gave it a completely different twist from the books. Whilst the Sherlock Holmes I read about and remember is a prim, proper and decent detective from Scotland Yard, this one here is an unorthodox, flippant, outrageous and I would say, mad, detective with the ability to Sherlock Holmes is alive, he would flip in his grave, figuratively speaking.
Then again, this is also the success formula for these two action-packed movies, I think. I must admit Robert Downey Jr. played this character very well. His intelligence, sense of humour and humanity is without a doubt what make this character very charismatic and well-received. And when there is Sherlock Holmes, there will always be the more down to earth Dr Watson, played by Jude Law, who really played second fiddle in the two movies. Rachel McAdams had a small part to play and was killed off within minutes into the show.
Like the first movie, the movie was quite long at more than two hours but one would not be too pre-occupied with it because of the fast pace. I may not dislike this movie but then again, it would never make it to my list of favourite movies either.
Anyway, I went to watch the above recently and it was exactly what I expected it to be. Directed by Guy Ritchie, this recent series on the famous detective gave it a completely different twist from the books. Whilst the Sherlock Holmes I read about and remember is a prim, proper and decent detective from Scotland Yard, this one here is an unorthodox, flippant, outrageous and I would say, mad, detective with the ability to Sherlock Holmes is alive, he would flip in his grave, figuratively speaking.
Then again, this is also the success formula for these two action-packed movies, I think. I must admit Robert Downey Jr. played this character very well. His intelligence, sense of humour and humanity is without a doubt what make this character very charismatic and well-received. And when there is Sherlock Holmes, there will always be the more down to earth Dr Watson, played by Jude Law, who really played second fiddle in the two movies. Rachel McAdams had a small part to play and was killed off within minutes into the show.
Like the first movie, the movie was quite long at more than two hours but one would not be too pre-occupied with it because of the fast pace. I may not dislike this movie but then again, it would never make it to my list of favourite movies either.
22 August 2010
THE LOVELY BONES
I wanted to write about this movie that I watched on the plane to Australia but forgot completely about it until today.
This beautiful but sad movie featured a star-studded cast including Mark Wahlberg and Rachel Weisz as the parents, Susan Sarandon as the grandma, Stanley Tucci as the rapist and Saoirse Ronan as the young girl.
Saoirse was Susie Salmon, the 17-yo girl who was reported missing on her way home. Mark and Rachel were her parents Jack and Abigail. Stanley was the freakish paedophile neighbour George who preyed on young girls.
Their acting was absolutely superb. The anguish, despair, desperation etc felt by Abigail was painful to watch. Jack's never give up attitude to find his missing daughter was admirable. George was indescribably scary in his portrayal of the scheming and elusive rapist. And Susie was just so pure and beautiful and her acting was credible. At just 16 yo in real life, I remember seeing her in the movie 'City of Ember' in 2008. She was younger then and is so much prettier and mature now.
Anyway, the story was set in 1973 in Pennyslvannia, a suburb of Philadelphia, when Susie took a shortcut home from school across a corn field and was never seen again. It was later revealed that she was likely raped and murdered when her hat and dismembered elbow was found by the local authorities.
This movie was unusual in that it explored the afterlife and depicted Susie's soul watching the events unfolded and how her family coped with her disappearance. In fact, she was the character that narrated the story throughout the movie. She was not in heaven because of what happened to her. Instead, she was trapped in purgatory for what seemed like eternity. The purgatory was like a fictional place that is left to the imagination with out of this world scenery. It was here where she met the other victims of George, who like her, were trapped in this state.
Anyway, unable to reconcile with her death and loss, her mom Abigail left Jack because it was too painful to live in the house. Jack, on the other hand, relentlessly carried out his own investigations when the police found no clues to her whereabouts. He never gave up and found his neighbour George to be a suspicious character, after the latter was found stalking Susie's young sister. His confrontation with George was futile and allowed him to escape, but not before disposing of the safe in a very deep excavated common refuse dump in the ground, used by all the townsfolk.
George stalked his potential victims, then hatched different ploys to lure the young girls to his lair, which he created from his own sketches, where he raped, murdered and dismembered their bodies before disposing of their bodies. He constructed an underground hideout in a field, with toys etc to lure Susie in, and once inside she knew she could not escape his clutches. He kept her remains in a locked safe in the basement of his house, where he would frequently sit on a chair looking at the safe and reminisced and enjoyed his memories of what he did to Susie. After he returned to Pennsylvannia years later, he tried to chat up another young girl, who rebuffed his advances. Minutes later, he lost his footing by accident and fell down a ravine to his death. From the audience's perspective, that was the best revenge exacted on the serial killer.
To me, there wasn't any closure to Susie's death, because no one ever found her remains or knew what happened to her in 1973. The only person who knew everything was the killer who took everything with him when he died a horrendous death.
The movie ended with Susie's narrative voice whispering "I wish you all a long and happy life." after her young sister gave birth to a newborn girl and a man who found her charm bracelet.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









(141009090905)the-lovely-bones-3.jpg)


